Please give actual discussion points, not generalities. You mentioned it lacks comedy. I thought i put comedy in every scene. That is something to discuss.
I come from a screenwriter perspective where you start with action. You don't waste time world building or character building. You put them in the world and have them go. Basically, you don't spoon feed the audience. I don't mean to imply anything with that statement. That is just what my professors have used to explain the process. Exposition slows down the story. Have the information revealed through action.
Since i am talking about movies and television, can you name one that starts with the method you prefer? i might be able to find a middle ground between the two.
You might want to stop giving orders. It doesn't seem like you actually want help... If not, why did you post your script here?
You said
in literature, now you've changed your statement. It's usually good to start a Television Series or movie with action. Novels don't necessarily have to, and it's certainly not the first rule of writing. 1984, Frankenstein and A Tale of Two Cities all start with very important non-action descriptions that set the tone and theme of the novel.
Lost in Translation is a movie that doesn't start with action, and Alien also comes to mind. You can also add Dr Strangelove, the Shining and Cinema Paradiso to that list, all well known masterpieces. Even The Godfather starts without major action.