Now why does that sound offensive? Don't you think I'm trying to draw an actual body? I've been drawing for 2yrs, step-by-step tutorials, real life sketches and even going through books from Andrew Loomis. So please don't assume I've been trying to draw pigs? If you don't mind me saying. Should really learn your choice of words when critiquing people's works.
Don't get easily offended. I'm telling you draw an actual body. As in an actual person that you see in front of you, not the misproportioned figures you draw. 2 years is A LOT of time to improve on. And (now don't get offended) but this doesn't look like work that took two years of improvement. Drawing more people should help you build more defining features to your characters figures.
This should only encourage you to work at a more faster pace. I've said it before and I'll say it again: I give you what you need to hear. I'm not here to baby anyone, I'm not here to tickle your ears.. I'm here to help those who need it and have the stomach to actually hear what they need.
Also have to defend my story if you don't mind. Sorry but it's the way I choose to tell it and feel I must explain it.
Have you thought that's only how much information I wanted to tell the reader?
You have had a poor way of doing it. Just because it was by choice doesn't mean its a good choice. That's something that you will learn.
Through my literature, I tell the reader what he wants to know about the story. I was going to involve a lot more races as well as civilizations and politics, but the introduction was hogging up a lot space and I wanted to get right down to the story and so I told the reader what they needed to know, about the Dharem, there are daemons, people are basically DBZ fighters and there's an feck load of mythology. Bam, all you're going to need to know, anymore you want to know, you can find out from my character it goes into more detail about the world.
The introduction took more space because you chose to make it that way. Half of the things in the introduction were unnecessary. You mentioned a world with many names (could've easily defined the world by giving it a proper name), with many theories of creation (I'm sure the real way will be revealed in the plot so there's no point in making a panel for theories), and the only one that matters is the race you actually expanded on and the theory they perceive. So 2/3 of the introduction didn't really offer anything.
Sorry, I think being confused over the story simply because of 'key specifics' not be shown to you is not understandable to me.
often times, when you're creating a fantasy world, you need key specific details that makes your fantasy world "yours". This is what most manga follow because theirs always works that look the same. Your story jumps right in, but we can't see what makes your world different from the others.
You only have one race introduced, but you have no specific name for your world and no specific races.
Again I appreciate you trying to give feedback and trying to help and I am glad you are telling me to work on, but I'm honest as well... Also arrogant, egotistical and I love myself a little too much. But looking at the first line again of your latest post, I'm now jumping to assumptions here, but I feel you find something's wrong with praise helping people to improve their work. It relieves people and helps them insure they don't have to focus or strain themselves on it too much. I'm just recently learning that my fight scenes aren't as bad as I thought it was and my facial expressions are good that I'm learning what makes my work good and what makes it valuable, also it motivates me and know I'm doing it correctly.
Here is something you should know. I gave you advice to improve on. Giving you advice shows that the critic sees potential. That alone should be enough motivation than praise alone. Praise is good for only one thing and one thing only: to give confidence.
Also you should learn to praise people's work as well as tell it's a pile of crud. No offense of course, but it's the critic's ultimate defense. If you keep telling all this criticism, the artist will assume you're just trying to be mean and unfair. Imagine a janitor who just mopped an entire school floor, your the principal and you come along tell how he missed a spot, how do you think the janitor would feel after working for hours doing all that work, let alone his relations with the principal now. Make sure to give the praise first as well, yes,, first appearances and all that (Give a friendly attitude first before a nasty one) it's possible that the artist might just flounder over the praise and ignore your criticism, but then he was just a waste of your time to begin with. Those who can take in both your praise and criticism, are well potential artists.
Just saying all this from my experience of telling people mean things about their literature work, but having them actually improve it. I just felt I needed it mentioned.
That's what I been doing. Don't see it? That's on you.